Least Squares Regression Line Math Example 2

Follow the full solution, then compare it with the other examples linked below.

Example 2

hard
The LSRL for predicting weight (yy, kg) from height (xx, cm) is y^=โˆ’100+0.8x\hat{y} = -100 + 0.8x. Interpret the slope and intercept, predict weight for height=175 cm, and explain why extrapolating to height=50 cm is problematic.

Solution

  1. 1
    Slope: for each 1 cm increase in height, weight increases by 0.8 kg on average
  2. 2
    Intercept (โˆ’100-100): predicted weight at height=0 cm; clearly nonsensical (no person has height=0); the intercept serves as a mathematical anchor
  3. 3
    Prediction at x=175: y^=โˆ’100+0.8(175)=โˆ’100+140=40\hat{y} = -100 + 0.8(175) = -100 + 140 = 40 kg
  4. 4
    Extrapolation at x=50: y^=โˆ’100+0.8(50)=โˆ’100+40=โˆ’60\hat{y} = -100 + 0.8(50) = -100 + 40 = -60 kg โ€” impossible (negative weight!); linear model only valid in observed height range

Answer

Slope=0.8 kg/cm; intercept is meaningless extrapolation. Prediction at 175 cm = 40 kg. Extrapolating to 50 cm gives nonsensical -60 kg.
Always interpret slope in context: 'for each 1-unit increase in x, y increases by b on average.' The intercept is often contextually meaningless (x=0 may be outside observed range). Never extrapolate beyond the observed x range โ€” the linear relationship may not hold.

About Least Squares Regression Line

The unique straight line y^=a+bx\hat{y} = a + bx that minimizes the sum of squared vertical distances (residuals) between the observed data points and the line.

Learn more about Least Squares Regression Line โ†’

More Least Squares Regression Line Examples