Least Squares Regression Line Math Example 2
Follow the full solution, then compare it with the other examples linked below.
Example 2
hardThe LSRL for predicting weight (, kg) from height (, cm) is . Interpret the slope and intercept, predict weight for height=175 cm, and explain why extrapolating to height=50 cm is problematic.
Solution
- 1 Slope: for each 1 cm increase in height, weight increases by 0.8 kg on average
- 2 Intercept (): predicted weight at height=0 cm; clearly nonsensical (no person has height=0); the intercept serves as a mathematical anchor
- 3 Prediction at x=175: kg
- 4 Extrapolation at x=50: kg โ impossible (negative weight!); linear model only valid in observed height range
Answer
Slope=0.8 kg/cm; intercept is meaningless extrapolation. Prediction at 175 cm = 40 kg. Extrapolating to 50 cm gives nonsensical -60 kg.
Always interpret slope in context: 'for each 1-unit increase in x, y increases by b on average.' The intercept is often contextually meaningless (x=0 may be outside observed range). Never extrapolate beyond the observed x range โ the linear relationship may not hold.
About Least Squares Regression Line
The unique straight line that minimizes the sum of squared vertical distances (residuals) between the observed data points and the line.
Learn more about Least Squares Regression Line โMore Least Squares Regression Line Examples
Example 1 medium
Find the least-squares regression line for: [formula]: [formula]. Use [formula] and [formula].
Example 3 easyGiven [formula]: (a) predict [formula] when [formula], (b) interpret the slope, (c) does the line pa
Example 4 hardThe LSRL has the property of minimizing [formula]. Explain why minimizing squared residuals (rather