Congruence Criteria Math Example 4

Follow the full solution, then compare it with the other examples linked below.

Example 4

hard
Explain why SSA (two sides and a non-included angle) is NOT a valid congruence criterion by giving a counterexample or geometric explanation.

Solution

  1. 1
    Step 1: In SSA, you know two sides and the angle opposite one of them (not between the two sides). Given side aa (opposite the known angle θ\theta), side bb, and angle θ\theta, try to construct the triangle.
  2. 2
    Step 2: Fix side bb and angle θ\theta. The third vertex lies on a circle of radius aa centered at the end of bb. This circle can intersect the opposite ray in 0, 1, or 2 points — two points means two different valid triangles with the same SSA data.
  3. 3
    Step 3: Example: b=10b = 10, a=8a = 8, θ=35°\theta = 35°. There can be two distinct triangles (the 'ambiguous case'). Therefore SSA does not guarantee a unique triangle, so it is not a valid congruence criterion.

Answer

SSA is not valid because of the 'ambiguous case' — two different triangles can satisfy the same SSA conditions.
SSA fails as a congruence criterion because the given angle is not between the two given sides, leaving the triangle's shape ambiguous. Depending on the relative lengths, zero, one, or two triangles may satisfy the conditions. This is called the ambiguous case of the law of sines, and it is why SSA is not listed alongside SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, and HL.

About Congruence Criteria

Five sets of conditions that guarantee two triangles are congruent: SSS (three pairs of equal sides), SAS (two sides and the included angle), ASA (two angles and the included side), AAS (two angles and a non-included side), and HL (hypotenuse-leg for right triangles).

Learn more about Congruence Criteria →

More Congruence Criteria Examples